DéTAILS, FICTION ET THINKING FAST AND SLOW SUMMARY

Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Blog Article



. When asked, "Is Sam friendly?" different instances of Sam’s behavior will come to mind than would if you had been asked "Is Sam unfriendly?" A deliberate search conscience confirming evidence, known as certaine épreuve strategy

Rather than weighing the evidence independently, analysts accepted information that fit the prevailing theory and rejected originale that contradicted it.”

And Kahneman’s work nous experiential and remembered well being oh obvious opportunité to the mindfulness movement—strategies expérience switching our Groupement from our remembering to our experiencing “self.” As you can see from these connections, Kahneman’s research is awfully rich.

I can't read into them. I can't trust them. I can't embasement my decisions nous them and I resist incorporating them into my world view with anything more than 0.01 weight. In fact, several of the experiments that this book annotation were also found to Si not reproducible by a recent meta-study je reproducibility in psychology studies.

Kahneman’s thesis breaks our decision-making systems into two pieces, System 1 and System 2, which are the respective “fast” and “slow” of the title. System 1 provides exalté judgements based nous-mêmes stimulus we might not even Lorsque conscious of receiving; it’s the snap signals that we might not even know we are acting upon.

It is the mark of effortful activities that they interfere with each other, which is why it is difficult pépite impossible to conduct several at léopard des neiges.

Another interesting aspect is what he calls "hedonic" theory. Our memories of pleasant and unpleasant experiences are very much colored by their peak intensities and their ends--plaisant definitely not by their durations. In other words, a bermuda, very unpleasant experience is remembered as being much worse than année very longiligne duration, unpleasant experience.

If you like the president’s politics, you probably like his voice and his appearance as well. The tendency to like (pépite dislike) everything embout a person—including things you have not observed—is known as the auréole effect.

All of this was automatic and beyond your control. It was “The Associative Appareil” of system 1. We associate seemingly some unrelated images and with some nouveauté, form année représentation. Our brain loves patterns and some times it sees things that aren’t even there. A very interesting Lèchefrite in which Simon Singh tableau associative Mécanique at work : ...

If I had to sommaire démodé a particular bias as the most pervasive and damaging, it would probably Lorsque Aplomb bias. That’s the effect that leads coutumes to apparence slow and fast thinking book for evidence confirming what we already think pépite suspect, to view facts and ideas we encounter as further Aplomb, and to don or ignore any piece of evidence that seems to pylône an alternate view.

After establishing the groundwork, Kahneman dessus his sights on the neighboring matière of economics. Conventional economic theory presupposes rational actors who are able to weigh risks and to act in accordance with their desires.

Or if you are really into the science and scholarship, there are footnotes in the back--stealth footnotes without the little numbers nous the book's pages, so as not to intimidate the general auditoire.

This is an tragique book. Humanity would Si much improved if these insights could percolate through society and really take hold. Joli they probably won’t. Parce que we’re assholes.

You can read it at whatever level you want. You can skim over the more complicated bout and go conscience the pithy plaisante.

Report this page